Get in the zone with me for a good 15 minutes, maybe you’ll catch a few eclipse tricks and you’ll learn a little bit about how I think (and make mistakes along the way of fixing something on FrostWire)
Related Posts
[SOLVED] Java7 SMTP Issue (Caused by: sun.security.pkcs11.wrapper.PKCS11Exception)
So you had your little program that would use AWS to send emails, and all of a sudden after a Java 7 update you get a stack trace like this: [java] javax.mail.MessagingException: Could not connect to SMTP host: email-smtp.us-east-1.amazonaws.com, port: 465; nested exception is: javax.net.ssl.SSLException: Server key at com.sun.mail.smtp.SMTPTransport.openServer(SMTPTransport.java:1962) at com.sun.mail.smtp.SMTPTransport.protocolConnect(SMTPTransport.java:654) at javax.mail.Service.connect(Service.java:295) at javax.mail.Service.connect(Service.java:176) […]
Guia de Ejercicios y Comandos para el uso de Haskell (1998)
Descarga mi Guia de Ejercicios Esta guia la escribi en 3er semestre de Ingenieria Informatica despues de ver mi primer curso de Algoritmos y Programacion, para este curso la facultad decidio que era un buen experimento ensenarnos a hacer nuestros primeros programas con un lenguaje funcional llamado Haskell. Echenle un ojo, demasiado comica la guia, […]
[CODING/SOLVED] gradle build (android) breaks after upgrading a dependency with NullPointerException thrown at ProgramClass.constantPoolEntryAccept
You’ve just upgraded one of your Android project’s dependencies and when you ./gradlew assembleRelease the build process breaks. You invoke it again with –stacktrace to find the following exception: [pastacode lang=”java” manual=”java.lang.NullPointerException%0Aat%20proguard.classfile.ProgramClass.constantPoolEntryAccept(ProgramClass.java%3A537)%0Aat%20proguard.shrink.UsageMarker.markConstant(UsageMarker.java%3A1246)%0Aat%20proguard.shrink.UsageMarker.visitRequiresInfo(UsageMarker.java%3A1040)%0Aat%20proguard.classfile.attribute.module.ModuleAttribute.requiresAccept(ModuleAttribute.java%3A138)%0Aat%20proguard.shrink.UsageMarker.visitModuleAttribute(UsageMarker.java%3A739)%0Aat%20proguard.classfile.attribute.module.ModuleAttribute.accept(ModuleAttribute.java%3A99)%0Aat%20proguard.classfile.ProgramClass.attributesAccept(ProgramClass.java%3A619)%0Aat%20proguard.shrink.UsageMarker.markProgramClassBody(UsageMarker.java%3A124)%0Aat%20proguard.shrink.UsageMarker.visitProgramClass(UsageMarker.java%3A94)%0Aat%20proguard.classfile.visitor.MultiClassVisitor.visitProgramClass(MultiClassVisitor.java%3A67)%0Aat%20proguard.classfile.visitor.MultiClassVisitor.visitProgramClass(MultiClassVisitor.java%3A67)%0Aat%20proguard.classfile.visitor.ClassNameFilter.visitProgramClass(ClassNameFilter.java%3A128)%0Aat%20proguard.classfile.ProgramClass.accept(ProgramClass.java%3A430)%0Aat%20proguard.classfile.ClassPool.classesAccept(ClassPool.java%3A124)%0Aat%20proguard.classfile.visitor.AllClassVisitor.visitClassPool(AllClassVisitor.java%3A45)%0Aat%20proguard.classfile.visitor.MultiClassPoolVisitor.visitClassPool(MultiClassPoolVisitor.java%3A85)%0Aat%20proguard.classfile.ClassPool.accept(ClassPool.java%3A110)%0Aat%20proguard.shrink.Shrinker.execute(Shrinker.java%3A90)%0Aat%20proguard.ProGuard.shrink(ProGuard.java%3A381)%0Aat%20proguard.ProGuard.execute(ProGuard.java%3A145)%0Aat%20proguard.ProGuard.main(ProGuard.java%3A572)” message=”” highlight=”” provider=”manual”/] This is a ProGuard bug, which my friend, has been solved by the ProGuard team ages ago, and your […]